My head fell off my shoulders this week when I heard the latest news, be that as it may, coming out of California and New York.
On Thursday, January 17, 2019, it was announced that “the California legislature is recognizing a “non-binary designation as a gender” and banning the use of “he” and “she” in hearings, stated Senate Judiciary Chair Hannah-Beth Jackson.” (LifeSiteNews.com)
Well how about that! If I lived in California and had a guest, as in one person, in my home and I was sharing that experience with you, wouldn’t you be confused as to how many guests I had if I said, “They were here for a week?” There is no clarity in that statement if I am referring to one person but there is a lot of confusion.
But that isn’t the half of it, according to an older article, dated October 17, 2017, in Fox News.com, “California health care workers who “willfully and repeatedly” decline to use a senior transgender patient’s “preferred name or pronouns” could face punishments ranging from a fine to jail time under a newly signed law.” I think what that means is if I am a woman, which I am, and I identify as a man, which I don’t, then you have to call me Mr. or Sir, even though I continue to look like a woman. Did I get that right?
Okay, so I’m confused. I recently saw a video clip of a they who was born as a man but who identifies as a woman who still wears man’s clothing along with they’s heavy makeup and long hair. They was throwing the tantrum of a two-year-old when someone addressed ‘they’ as sir. They demanded to be addressed as a woman although they looked very much like a man with long hair and makeup. They even offered to take the errant clerk outside and beat him (or I guess it would be they) up if he/they continued to call him/her/they as sir. I really am confused now, especially when I consider that most women – naturally born women – would not take a clerk outside and beat him/they up, would she/they.
We can shake our heads and say, “Well, what do you expect from California?” Yep! But the other coast has gone off the rails as well. It seems New York has decided that the 82,189 abortions performed in their state in 2016( the last year of available statistics) could have been more if there had been more health-care practitioners authorized to perform them, including late-term and partial birth abortions. Yep! New York needs more abortions. Offer those babies up to Molek – why not. After all, they are terribly inconvenient intrusions into the lives of the ‘theys’ that were created by God to bring life into the world.
Perhaps it would be wise if both California and New York would study the wisdom of Isaiah 5: 20 – 25 where God – a HE – speaks of our upside-down world and the woes that are coming upon us if we don’t get our act together. Oh, wait! I forgot. It is now illegal in some cities, if not all, for one to sell Bibles in California. Well that explains it all, doesn’t it. At least for California, but what about New York? They still have Bibles, don’t they? Oh well, it doesn’t really matter, does it? After all, this is God’s creation that we are talking about and if you don’t believe in God then I guess it doesn’t matter what you do to His – yes HIS – creation.
Personally, I hope we build another wall, this time around both states, California and New York so we can keep the crazies in there and not infect the rest of this beautiful country. Enough said.